Skip to main content

SMS sender scheme expanded

The Office of the Communications Authority (OFCA) announced today that the SMS Sender Registration Scheme is now open for application by all sectors to further help the public verify the identities of SMS senders, with a view to combatting SMS fraud.   Apart from further opening up the scheme, the OFCA said it welcomes public and private organisations from various industries with a practical need to communicate with customers or clients via SMS to join the scheme.   Under the scheme, only registered senders are able to send SMS messages using their registered SMS sender IDs with the prefix “#”. All other SMS messages with sender IDs containing “#” but not sent by registered senders will be blocked by the telecommunications networks.   As such, the public can easily identify whether an SMS message is received from a registered sender by the prefix “#” in the SMS sender ID.   The OFCA reminds citizens to stay highly vigilant when receiving SMS messages from unknown sender

Judicial independence defended: SJ

Our judicial system is highly regarded and internationally recognised. Hong Kong cases are cited in overseas jurisprudence from time to time, which speaks volumes on the confidence of the global legal community in the integrity and quality of Hong Kong’s judicial system. However, it appears that our judicial system has become a target of savage criticisms which are motived by political overtones.   The Department of Justice (DoJ) has reiterated that members of the public have the right to express their views on court decisions and related matters within the boundary permitted by the law. However, unrestrained personal attacks on judges are never tolerated. When the Court of Final Appeal was unjustly accused of giving in to pressure in reaching a decision, the DoJ promptly defended the Judiciary by dismissing such defamatory remarks. When the intimidation against a judicial officer came to light last month, the DoJ also in no time issued a press statement to condemn the violent act.   Judicial independence is the cornerstone of our society. Safeguarding judicial independence is not just the duty of any particular lawyer, but an obligation of every single law-abiding citizen. In my speech delivered at the Ceremonial Opening of the Legal Year 2018, I said that “it is my duty to ensure that the independence of our Judiciary, as enshrined in the Basic Law, is respected and not arbitrarily attacked or criticised. I urge the community to take the same stance.” In particular the two legal professional bodies, the Hong Kong Bar Association and the Law Society of Hong Kong, which are the crucial stakeholders of the legal sector, are duty bound under the Rules & Regulations and the Memorandum of Association respectively to safeguard our judicial independence.   Since 2019, the Judiciary was under attack on many occasions, be it destruction of court facilities or malicious attacks against the Judiciary. The DoJ spared no efforts to defend the judicial system. When doxxing activities towards judges and other persons involved in the administration of justice were on the rise, as guardian of public interest, I made an application for injunction in October last year to restrain acts of doxxing against judicial officers and their family members. In granting the injunction, the court heavily condemned the conduct of doxxing by saying “what is impermissible is for the public commentary or criticism to descend into personal attacks, or worse still to the public encouragement of the invasion of privacy of, or harassment of, or threats to, or attempted intimidation of judges or judicial officers or their families".   Any person who acts in violation of an injunction order may be held in contempt of court. Under common law, criminal contempt of court means conduct calculated to interfere with the due administration of justice, and that there must be a real risk that the due administration of justice would be undermined by the relevant conduct. Criminal contempt of court can take many forms. Examples are conduct disrupting court hearings or insulting judicial officers; refusing to be sworn to give evidence when called as a witness in the face of the court; scandalising the court by scurrilous words or conduct against judges; publication of any report which prejudices the fair trial of ongoing proceedings; and obstructing the execution of court orders, etc. A common thread which exists in these examples is the real risk of undermining the administration of justice caused by the objectionable conduct. The sanction in criminal contempt is to maintain public confidence in the administration of justice in Hong Kong, and therefore, for the protection of the rule of law. The DoJ would assess each circumstance objectively and carefully to ascertain whether the element of contempt of court is found. In the case of scandalising the court, contemnors found liable can be fined and sentenced to imprisonment.   Individuals from local and overseas communities, from time to time, have been found expressing views on certain ongoing cases. A number of politicians used to irrationally ask for the withdrawal of charges against some defendants and demand for their immediate release, or even launch spiteful comments on personnel who carry out prosecution work. For cases in which the legal proceedings are still underway, it is inappropriate for any of us, not only the DoJ, to comment as it is a matter of sub-judice. Members of the public ought to wait until the court arrives at a decision and they are advised to read the judgment in order to form any objective and informed discussions. Only by carefully reading and correctly understanding court judgments, one would be able to dispel any unwarranted misunderstanding.   Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng wrote this article and posted it on her blog on January 17.
http://dlvr.it/RqlJTM

Popular posts from this blog

Legal officer changes proposed

The Government has proposed to amend the law to allow legal officers of the Department of Justice to be appointed as a senior counsel.   At a media session after attending a Legislative Council meeting today, Secretary for Justice Teresa Cheng explained the rationale behind the Government's proposal.   She said: “Why is it that my colleagues in the Department of Justice - who by their qualifications are solicitors but are actually arguing very well and very efficiently with great eloquence and efficacy in the Court of Final Appeal - are not being recognised when they are actually even better than their counterparts? That has always been something that sometimes troubles me.   “And for that reason, I have always been thinking about how we are going to overcome that problem.   “Now, what really triggers my determination to take this further forward is when one of our Deputy Directors of Public Prosecutions, Vinci Lam, took silk on May 29.   “That really showed that the form

Skewed remarks about NSL rejected

The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government today said it strongly disapproved of and firmly rejected the wanton slanders and smears concerning the implementation of “one country, two systems” and the National Security Law (NSL) in Hong Kong by certain US and UK politicians.   In a statement issued tonight, the Hong Kong SAR Government noted that such slanders and smears were recently made through a statement by certain members of the US Senate on the 26th anniversary of Hong Kong’s return to the motherland and the third anniversary of the implementation of the NSL, and by the House of Commons of the UK Parliament through a debate on the aforesaid third anniversary.   It said it strongly disapproves of and firmly rejects the unfounded remarks and slanders by the US and UK politicians regarding the Hong Kong SAR where “one country, two systems” is successfully implemented.   It also strongly urges the politicians to immediately stop acting against the international law and

CE to meet Congo president

Chief Executive John Lee will meet Democratic Republic of Congo President FĂ©lix-Antoine Tshisekedi Tshilombo at Government House tomorrow, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government announced today.   The Congo president is in the People’s Republic of China for a state visit and will arrive in Hong Kong for a two-day trip. http://dlvr.it/Spnmcs